Iwai v. City and County of Honolulu

Hawaii Supreme Court

Iwai v. City and County of Honolulu

459 P.2d 195, 51 Haw. 307, 1969 Haw. LEXIS 123

CourtHawaii Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 26, 1969

Docket4905

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 459 P.2d 195 (Iwai v. City and County of Honolulu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Iwai v. City and County of Honolulu, 459 P.2d 195, 51 Haw. 307, 1969 Haw. LEXIS 123 (haw 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

These are appeals by plaintiffs in Civil No. 19011, and plaintiffs in Civil No. 19012, of the first circuit court, from summary judgments in favor of Kaneohe Ranch Company, Ltd., óné of multiple defendants, and from orders denying motions to vacate such judgments. The appeals were taken notwithstandingthe denial by the circuit court of plaintiffs’ motion for allowance of interlocutory appeals.

Kaneohe Ranch Company, Ltd., has moved to dismiss the appeals on the authority of Berkness v. Hawaiian *308 Electric Co., Ltd., 47 Haw. 479, 391 P.2d 869 (1964), and Chang v. City and County of Honolulu, 51 Haw. 137, 453 P.2d 753(1969). The motion is well taken, and is granted.

A. Singleton Cagle (Smith, Wild, Beebe & Cades of counsel) for appellee Kaneohe Ranch Company, Ltd., for the motion. Harriet Bouslog (Bouslog & Symonds of counsel, O. Vincent Esposito also on the brief) for appellants, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

These are appeals by plaintiffs in Civil No. 19011, and plaintiffs in Civil No. 19012, of the first circuit court, from summary judgments in favor of Kaneohe Ranch Company, Ltd., óné of multiple defendants, and from orders denying motions to vacate such judgments. The appeals were taken notwithstandingthe denial by the circuit court of plaintiffs’ motion for allowance of interlocutory appeals.

Kaneohe Ranch Company, Ltd., has moved to dismiss the appeals on the authority of Berkness v. Hawaiian *308 Electric Co., Ltd., 47 Haw. 479, 391 P.2d 869 (1964), and Chang v. City and County of Honolulu, 51 Haw. 137, 453 P.2d 753(1969). The motion is well taken, and is granted.

A. Singleton Cagle (Smith, Wild, Beebe & Cades of counsel) for appellee Kaneohe Ranch Company, Ltd., for the motion. Harriet Bouslog (Bouslog & Symonds of counsel, O. Vincent Esposito also on the brief) for appellants, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

459 P.2d 195, 51 Haw. 307, 1969 Haw. LEXIS 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iwai-v-city-and-county-of-honolulu-haw-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack