I.W v. City of Clovis Police Department

District Court, D. New Mexico·Decided May 24, 2021·No. 2:20-cv-00807·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

I.W.,

Plaintiff,

v. No. CV 20-807 CG/SMV

CITY OF CLOVIS POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFF TO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. In Plaintiff’s Complaint, (Doc. 1), filed on August 12, 2020, he conceals his identity, instead proceeding under the initials “I.W.” Proceeding anonymously is not contemplated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rather, Rule 10(a) requires that the title of a complaint “name all the parties,” and Rule 17(a) prescribes that “[a]n action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest.” Nonetheless, the Tenth Circuit has recognized there may be cases in which “exceptional circumstances” warrant permitting a party to proceed anonymously. Femedeer v. Haun, 227 F.3d 1244, 1246 (10th Cir. 2000) (quoting M.M. v. Zavaras, 139 F.3d 798, 800 (10th Cir. 1998)). Whether a plaintiff may proceed anonymously is subject to the discretion of the trial court. Zavaras, 139 F.3d at 802. In exercising that discretion, the court must “weigh[] the plaintiff’s claimed right of privacy against the countervailing public interest.” Id. at 803. In the Complaint, Plaintiff explains that his “initials are used to protect his privacy because he was a minor at the time [of the incident].” Id. at 1. The parties’ Joint Motion for Protective Order, (Doc. 23), filed on December 3, 2020, which the Court granted, likewise contemplated protecting Plaintiff's identity from public disclosure. See (Doc. 24 at 1). Given the parties’ agreement, as well as the interest in maintaining the privacy of juvenile criminal records, the Court finds anonymity outweighs the public interest in favor of openness in this case. The Court further finds no prejudice to Defendants—i.e., Defendants have not been hampered in their efforts to investigate and defend against Plaintiff's allegations. Therefore, the Court will grant Plaintiff permission to proceed anonymously in this matter. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff may proceed anonymously in this matter. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file, by no later than May 31, 2021, a complaint under seal that places on the record Plaintiff's real name as the party in interest. See W.N.J. v. Yocom, 257 F.3d 1171, 1172 (10th Cir. 2001) (“If a court grants permission [to proceed anonymously], it is often with the requirement that the real names of the plaintiff[] be disclosed to the defense and the court but kept under seal thereafter.”). In all other filings, Plaintiff may proceed as “I.W.” (2m — THE HONORABLE CARMEN E. GARZA CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

I.W v. City of Clovis Police Department, (D.N.M. 2021).

I.W v. City of Clovis Police Department (I.W v. City of Clovis Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

M.M. v. Zavaras
139 F.3d 798 (Tenth Circuit, 1998)
Femedeer v. Haun
227 F.3d 1244 (Tenth Circuit, 2000)
W.N.J. v. Yocom
257 F.3d 1171 (Tenth Circuit, 2001)