Ivy v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ivy v. State

386 S.W.3d 210, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1461, 2012 WL 5866576

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 20, 2012·No. No. ED 97899·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lenn A. Ivy, Jr. appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Ivy’s request for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lenn A. Ivy, Jr. appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Ivy’s request for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Ivy v. State, 386 S.W.3d 210, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1461, 2012 WL 5866576 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

386 S.W.3d 210 (Ivy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.