Ivy, Clinton Ray
This text of Ivy, Clinton Ray (Ivy, Clinton Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-94,232-01
EX PARTE CLINTON RAY IVY, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. F43633-A IN THE 413TH DISTRICT COURT FROM JOHNSON COUNTY
Per curiam. YEARY , J., filed a concurring opinion.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of continuous sexual abuse of a young child and sentenced to fifty
years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Ivy v. State, No.
14-10-00028-CR (Tex. App. — Houston [14th Dist.] March 17, 2011) (not designated for
publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction,
and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that trial counsel was ineffective because he failed to request a jury
instruction on the voluntariness of Applicant’s statement pursuant to Article 38.22, §6 of the Texas
Code of Criminal Procedure, and failed to object that the jury charge given misstated the burden of
proof for determining the voluntariness of Applicant’s statement. Applicant also alleges that 2
appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise these jury charge issues on direct appeal.
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466
U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate
forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial
counsel and appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. In developing the record, the trial
court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing,
it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented
by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE
CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify
this Court of counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s
performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall also make findings
of fact and conclusions of law as to whether appellate counsel’s performance was deficient and
Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems
appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 3
Filed: November 09, 2022 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ivy, Clinton Ray, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ivy-clinton-ray-texcrimapp-2022.