Ivory v. State
988 So. 2d 1108, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 8996, 2008 WL 2437050
Opinion
In this Anders1 appeal of his judgments and sentences, Ivory argues that the trial court erred in denying his pro se motion to withdraw plea. However, Ivory filed that motion without unequivocally requesting discharge of counsel. See King v. State, 939 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions that the trial court strike Ivory’s pro se motion to withdraw plea filed on September 5, 2006. See id.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ivory v. State, 988 So. 2d 1108, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 8996, 2008 WL 2437050 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).
988 So. 2d 1108 (Ivory v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
King v. State
939 So. 2d 1196 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)