Ivor, Inc. v. Hayes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ivor, Inc. v. Hayes

53 A.D.2d 541, 384 N.Y.S.2d 465, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13158

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 53 A.D.2d 541 (Ivor, Inc. v. Hayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ivor, Inc. v. Hayes, 53 A.D.2d 541, 384 N.Y.S.2d 465, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13158 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered April 29, 1975, dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, in the exercise of discretion, and the case restored to the calendar, without costs and without disbursements, conditioned on payment to defendant-respondent by plaintiff-appellant’s counsel personally of $350 costs within 20 days after service of a copy of the order entered hereon, or alternatively upon that condition not being performed, affirmed, with $40 costs and disbursements to respondent. Plaintiff’s counsel’s request for a further brief adjournment, denied by the trial court and followed by dismissal, was not based upon a substantial reason. However, plaintiff itself should not be denied its day in court because its lawyer had not brought a witness to court. The action is by no means frivolous, and is worthy of resolution at trial. Concur—Markewich, J. P., Kupferman, Lupiano, Silverman and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered April 29, 1975, dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, in the exercise of discretion, and the case restored to the calendar, without costs and without disbursements, conditioned on payment to defendant-respondent by plaintiff-appellant’s counsel personally of $350 costs within 20 days after service of a copy of the order entered hereon, or alternatively upon that condition not being performed, affirmed, with $40 costs and disbursements to respondent. Plaintiff’s counsel’s request for a further brief adjournment, denied by the trial court and followed by dismissal, was not based upon a substantial reason. However, plaintiff itself should not be denied its day in court because its lawyer had not brought a witness to court. The action is by no means frivolous, and is worthy of resolution at trial. Concur—Markewich, J. P., Kupferman, Lupiano, Silverman and Lane, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 A.D.2d 541, 384 N.Y.S.2d 465, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ivor-inc-v-hayes-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack