Ivie v. Harden
This text of 510 So. 2d 1257 (Ivie v. Harden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
In this appeal from a summary judgment in favor of Harden and Munroe, Ivie contends that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment declaring his land sales contract with Harden to be voidable. We reverse.
Ivie asserts that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because there were material questions of fact regarding the adequacy of a realtor’s disclosure of his dual agency relationship. We agree that there was a genuine issue of material fact on the question of the adequacy of the disclosure, and that the entry of summary judgment in favor of Harden was improper.
Accordingly, the summary judgment is reversed and this case is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
510 So. 2d 1257, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2026, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ivie-v-harden-fladistctapp-1987.