Ivie v. Harden

510 So. 2d 1257, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2026, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9956
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 19, 1987
DocketNo. BP-385
StatusPublished

This text of 510 So. 2d 1257 (Ivie v. Harden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ivie v. Harden, 510 So. 2d 1257, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2026, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9956 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from a summary judgment in favor of Harden and Munroe, Ivie contends that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment declaring his land sales contract with Harden to be voidable. We reverse.

Ivie asserts that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because there were material questions of fact regarding the adequacy of a realtor’s disclosure of his dual agency relationship. We agree that there was a genuine issue of material fact on the question of the adequacy of the disclosure, and that the entry of summary judgment in favor of Harden was improper.

Accordingly, the summary judgment is reversed and this case is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

THOMPSON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur. BARFIELD, J., dissents with written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Quest v. Barge
41 So. 2d 158 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
510 So. 2d 1257, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2026, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ivie-v-harden-fladistctapp-1987.