Ivey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ivey v. State

779 So. 2d 662, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3426, 2001 WL 261602

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 19, 2001

DocketNo. 1D00-1647

StatusPublished

This text of 779 So. 2d 662 (Ivey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ivey v. State, 779 So. 2d 662, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3426, 2001 WL 261602 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s conviction for the offense of disorderly intoxication is reversed and the case is remanded with directions to vacate the conviction, because the evidence was legally insufficient to establish, as required by section 856.011(1), Florida Statutes (1999), that he caused “a public disturbance.” See Jernigan v. State, 566 So.2d 39 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Blake v. State, 433 So.2d 611 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ERVIN, WEBSTER and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s conviction for the offense of disorderly intoxication is reversed and the case is remanded with directions to vacate the conviction, because the evidence was legally insufficient to establish, as required by section 856.011(1), Florida Statutes (1999), that he caused “a public disturbance.” See Jernigan v. State, 566 So.2d 39 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Blake v. State, 433 So.2d 611 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ERVIN, WEBSTER and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

779 So. 2d 662, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3426, 2001 WL 261602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ivey-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack