Ivey v. State
519 So. 2d 648, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 130, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 24, 1988 WL 134
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 6, 1988
DocketNo. 87-0630
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 519 So. 2d 648 (Ivey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ivey v. State, 519 So. 2d 648, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 130, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 24, 1988 WL 134 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
We affirm the conviction but reverse the imposition of costs because appellant was not afforded notice or a hearing. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Upon remand, the trial court may, in the exercise of its discretion, either enter an order striking costs or conduct a hearing and impose costs.
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rucker v. State
553 So. 2d 212 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Nash v. State
547 So. 2d 147 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Whiters v. State
533 So. 2d 1210 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
519 So. 2d 648, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 130, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 24, 1988 WL 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ivey-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.