Ivey v. State
519 So. 2d 648, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 130, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 24, 1988 WL 134
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 6, 1988·No. No. 87-0630·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
We affirm the conviction but reverse the imposition of costs because appellant was not afforded notice or a hearing. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Upon remand, the trial court may, in the exercise of its discretion, either enter an order striking costs or conduct a hearing and impose costs.
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ivey v. State, 519 So. 2d 648, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 130, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 24, 1988 WL 134 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
519 So. 2d 648 (Ivey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rucker v. State
553 So. 2d 212 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Nash v. State
547 So. 2d 147 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Whiters v. State
533 So. 2d 1210 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)