Ivey v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Ivey v. State

157 So. 2d 811

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedNovember 22, 1963

DocketNo. 33059

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 157 So. 2d 811 (Ivey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ivey v. State, 157 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for consideration an original petition for writ of habeas corpus dated November 6, 1963, seeking relief from a judgment of conviction for forgery entered in the Court of Record, Escambia County, Florida, in 1957. Motion to vacate filed pursuant to Rule 1, Supreme Court Rules of Criminal Procedure, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, was denied on April 29, 1963, ;by order of the trial court finding “from the Record in this cause that defendant waived his right” to appointment of counsel and is not entitled to the relief requested. Subsequent independent petition in the trial court was denied, pursuant to the Rule.

The current petition here concedes a failure to pursue timely appellate remedies under the Rule and presents no independent ground for invoking the jurisdiction of this Court. Art. V, Sec. 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Mitchell v. Wainwright, Fla.1963, 155 So.2d 868.

The writ is accordingly denied.

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have for consideration an original petition for writ of habeas corpus dated November 6, 1963, seeking relief from a judgment of conviction for forgery entered in the Court of Record, Escambia County, Florida, in 1957. Motion to vacate filed pursuant to Rule 1, Supreme Court Rules of Criminal Procedure, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, was denied on April 29, 1963, ;by order of the trial court finding “from the Record in this cause that defendant waived his right” to appointment of counsel and is not entitled to the relief requested. Subsequent independent petition in the trial court was denied, pursuant to the Rule.

The current petition here concedes a failure to pursue timely appellate remedies under the Rule and presents no independent ground for invoking the jurisdiction of this Court. Art. V, Sec. 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Mitchell v. Wainwright, Fla.1963, 155 So.2d 868.

The writ is accordingly denied.

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 So. 2d 811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ivey-v-state-fla-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack