Ivey v. Payne

70 S.E. 140, 8 Ga. App. 760, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 136
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 7, 1911·No. 3056·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Rowell, J.

1. Where a suit on a promissory note, or a series of promissory notes, is filed', and the petition recites the giving of the statutory notice for the collection of attorney’s fees, and the case is in default, the judge may, without further proof than the admission implied from the failure of the defendant to answer, direct a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the amount sued for.

2. The mere fact that the defendant in a case pending in a city court has filed in a superior court a petition seeking, among other things, to enjoin the action in the city court is no sufficient reason why the city court should not proceed with the ease therein pending, where no injunction has been'granted' against the prosecution of the action in the city court. • Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ivey v. Payne, 70 S.E. 140, 8 Ga. App. 760, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 136 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

70 S.E. 140 (Ivey v. Payne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knighton v. Alexander
59 S.E.2d 409 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
State Mutual Life Insurance v. Jacobs
137 S.E. 905 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Valdosta, Moultrie & Western Railroad v. Citizens Bank
80 S.E. 913 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Monk v. National Bank
76 S.E. 278 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)