Ivey v. Maguire

94 S.E.2d 383, 212 Ga. 590, 1956 Ga. LEXIS 452
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 7, 1956
Docket19411
StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E.2d 383 (Ivey v. Maguire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ivey v. Maguire, 94 S.E.2d 383, 212 Ga. 590, 1956 Ga. LEXIS 452 (Ga. 1956).

Opinion

Candler, Justice.

When, this litigation was formerly before this court, it was held that the trial judge erred in overruling a general demurrer which challenged the sufficiency of the petition to state a cause of action for the relief sought. Maguire v. Ivey, 212 Ga. 151 (91 S. E. 2d 35). Two amendments to the original petition, filed after the judgment this court rendered in the case on January 10, 1956, and before it was made the judgment of the trial court, do not in any material or substantial particular change its character. This being so, there is no' merit in the plaintiff’s contention that the court erred in dismissing on general demurrer the petition as amended. See Byrom v. Gunn, 111 Ga. 805 (35 S. E. 649); Powell v. Allen & Holmes, 134 Ga. 135 (67 S. E. 540); Scarborough v. Smith, 183 Ga. 386 (188 S. E. 526).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maguire v. Ivey
91 S.E.2d 35 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)
Byrom v. Gunn
35 S.E. 649 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Powell v. Allen & Holmes
67 S.E. 540 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
Scarborough v. Smith
183 Ga. 386 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Burgess v. Friar
188 S.E. 526 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E.2d 383, 212 Ga. 590, 1956 Ga. LEXIS 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ivey-v-maguire-ga-1956.