Ivey v. Keeling

281 U.S. 699, 50 S. Ct. 352
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 5, 1930
DocketNo. 670
StatusPublished

This text of 281 U.S. 699 (Ivey v. Keeling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ivey v. Keeling, 281 U.S. 699, 50 S. Ct. 352 (1930).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Hancock v. City of Muskogee, 250 U. S. [700]*700454; Valley Farms Co. v. County of Westchester, 261 U. S. 155; Browning v. Hooper, 269 U. S. 396, 405.

Mr. Thomas E. Hayden, Jr., for appellants. No appearance for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hancock v. City of Muskogee
250 U.S. 454 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Browning v. Hooper
269 U.S. 396 (Supreme Court, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 U.S. 699, 50 S. Ct. 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ivey-v-keeling-scotus-1930.