Ivey v. Georgia Southern & Florida Railroad
This text of 11 S.E. 128 (Ivey v. Georgia Southern & Florida Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence before the judge as to whether the' property of the plaintiffs would be damaged being conflicting, and. the decided preponderance thereof being that no actual damage-would be sustained, the judge did not abuse his discretion in denying a temporary injunction, more especially as he required bond and security to be given to cover the contingency of any recovery in the suit. If damages are established at the'trial, they may be' recovered under the prayer for general relief. Judgment affirmed.
Simmons, J , not presiding, because of sickness.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 S.E. 128, 84 Ga. 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ivey-v-georgia-southern-florida-railroad-ga-1890.