Ivey v. Georgia Southern & Florida Railroad

11 S.E. 128, 84 Ga. 536
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 31, 1890·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Bleckley, C. J.

The evidence before the judge as to whether the' property of the plaintiffs would be damaged being conflicting, and. the decided preponderance thereof being that no actual damage-would be sustained, the judge did not abuse his discretion in denying a temporary injunction, more especially as he required bond and security to be given to cover the contingency of any recovery in the suit. If damages are established at the'trial, they may be' recovered under the prayer for general relief. Judgment affirmed.

Simmons, J , not presiding, because of sickness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ivey v. Georgia Southern & Florida Railroad, 11 S.E. 128, 84 Ga. 536 (Ga. 1890).

11 S.E. 128 (Ivey v. Georgia Southern & Florida Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tompkins v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
79 S.E.2d 41 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Burell v. Pirkle
119 S.E. 529 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)
Armour & Co. v. Block
87 S.E. 18 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)
Everett v. Tabor
56 S.E. 123 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)