Ivey v. City of Rome

Supreme Court of Georgia

Ivey v. City of Rome

55 S.E. 1034, 126 Ga. 806, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 552

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 16, 1906

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 55 S.E. 1034 (Ivey v. City of Rome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ivey v. City of Rome, 55 S.E. 1034, 126 Ga. 806, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 552 (Ga. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

¡Evans, J.

1. The refusal of a judge to grant an ad interim restraining order in advance of the time set for a hearing of an application for a temporary injunction is not reviewable. Hollinshead v. Lincolnton, 84 Ga. 590; Mayor of Savannah v. Grayson, 104 Ga. 108; Smith v. Willis, 107 Ga. 793.

2. A decree at chambers dismissing a petition on motion can not be reviewed by a “fast” writ of error. Jordan v. Kelly, 63 Ga. 437.

3. If a bill of exceptions, properly sued out to the Supreme Court to review a final judgment, be docketed as a “fast” writ of error, when in fact it is not such, the case will not be dismissed, but will be transferred to the docket of the next term. Jones v. Warnock, 67 Ga. 484; Bacon v. Jones, 116 Ga. 136, 140. Ordered accordingly.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI