Ives v. Vandewater
1 How. Pr. 168
Opinion
Was clearly of opinion this was not a proper case for reference; that it ought to be tried at the circuit. Defendants’ papers show, and it is obvious from the nature of the defence that substantial questions of law will arise on the trial. The motion must be denied.
Decision.— Motion denied with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ives v. Vandewater, 1 How. Pr. 168 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).
1 How. Pr. 168 (Ives v. Vandewater) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Littlejohn v. Regents of the University of Wisconsin
37 N.W. 346 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1888)
Druse v. Horter
16 N.W. 14 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1883)
Carpenter v. Shepardson
43 Wis. 406 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1877)