Ives v. Rice

Supreme Court of Alabama

Ives v. Rice

84 Ala. 282

DecidedDecember 15, 1887

StatusPublished

This text of 84 Ala. 282 (Ives v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ives v. Rice, 84 Ala. 282 (Ala. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Excluding all illegal testimony to which objection is properly taken, there remains, in the opinion of the court, a sufficient amount of legal testimony to support the conclusion reached by the chancellor, that the decree sought to be enforced in favor of appellants against the ap[283]*283pllee had been fully paid and discharged prior to the sale of the land.

The sale was, therefore, properly set aside, and there was no error in the decree of the chancellor ordering the entry of satisfaction of the judgment, in favor of the appellant, under which the sale was made.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Excluding all illegal testimony to which objection is properly taken, there remains, in the opinion of the court, a sufficient amount of legal testimony to support the conclusion reached by the chancellor, that the decree sought to be enforced in favor of appellants against the ap[283]*283pllee had been fully paid and discharged prior to the sale of the land.

The sale was, therefore, properly set aside, and there was no error in the decree of the chancellor ordering the entry of satisfaction of the judgment, in favor of the appellant, under which the sale was made.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 Ala. 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ives-v-rice-ala-1887.