Ives v. Central Union Trust Co.

110 Misc. 740
New York Supreme Court·Decided June 15, 1919·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Van Siclen, J.

The apparent intention of the testator was to provide an income for each of his brothers during their respective lives, and after the termination of the trust the principal should go to his sister. The fact that one brother died previous to the testator offered no reason for rendering that expressed intention nugatory. The gift over to the sister, so far as it came through or by way of the deceased brother, became vested immediately upon the death of the testator subject only to the payment of the income that would have gone to the deceased brother if he had lived, to the survivor. The possibility of the death of either brother before the testator’s death was contemplated by the testator, was provided for in his will and was anticipated to such an extent, at least, that no further testamentary disposition, in so far as the death of either brother before the testator was concerned, was deemed necessary. Judgment is directed for the plaintiff.

Judgment for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ives v. Central Union Trust Co., 110 Misc. 740 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1919).

110 Misc. 740 (Ives v. Central Union Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Herdman v. Boardman
276 P. 394 (California Court of Appeal, 1929)
Ives v. Central Union Trust Co.
191 A.D. 895 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)