Iverson v. Wenzel

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Iverson v. Wenzel

6 La. App. 653, 1927 La. App. LEXIS 209

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 28, 1927

DocketNo. 2927

StatusPublished

This text of 6 La. App. 653 (Iverson v. Wenzel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Iverson v. Wenzel, 6 La. App. 653, 1927 La. App. LEXIS 209 (La. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

WEBB, J.

This action is based upon a promissory note drawn by defendant in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals from a judgment rendered against him for the amount of the note, interest and costs.

The answer of defendant is somewhat vague but appears to have been considered as a denial of liability on the ground that there was a failure of consideration.

The appellant has not appeared in court and directed our attention to any error in the judgment, and while under such circumstances we think we would be authorized to presume the judgment to be correct (Barber Asphalt Pav. Co vs. New Orleans, 49 La. Ann. 1608, 22 South. 955), however we have considered the record and are of the opinion that the evidence fails to establish the defense, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WEBB, J.

This action is based upon a promissory note drawn by defendant in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals from a judgment rendered against him for the amount of the note, interest and costs.

The answer of defendant is somewhat vague but appears to have been considered as a denial of liability on the ground that there was a failure of consideration.

The appellant has not appeared in court and directed our attention to any error in the judgment, and while under such circumstances we think we would be authorized to presume the judgment to be correct (Barber Asphalt Pav. Co vs. New Orleans, 49 La. Ann. 1608, 22 South. 955), however we have considered the record and are of the opinion that the evidence fails to establish the defense, and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 La. App. 653, 1927 La. App. LEXIS 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iverson-v-wenzel-lactapp-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack