Iverson v. Jones
5 P. 626, 2 Cal. Unrep. 437
This text of 5 P. 626 (Iverson v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Iverson v. Jones, 5 P. 626, 2 Cal. Unrep. 437 (Cal. 1885).
Opinion
The court is of opinion that the appeals in these cases must be dismissed. The undertakings on appeal were filed more than a month before the notices of appeal were filed. This, in our view, is not the undertaking required by law. It is not the case of insufficiency in the undertaking, but it is no undertaking at all. The motions to dismiss must be granted; and it is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 P. 626, 2 Cal. Unrep. 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iverson-v-jones-cal-1885.