Iverson v. Iverson

903 P.2d 1328, 127 Idaho 631, 1995 Ida. LEXIS 148
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 10, 1995
DocketNo. 22168
StatusPublished

This text of 903 P.2d 1328 (Iverson v. Iverson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Iverson v. Iverson, 903 P.2d 1328, 127 Idaho 631, 1995 Ida. LEXIS 148 (Idaho 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Richard M. Iverson has filed a Notice of Appeal from an order of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District in and for the State of Idaho dismissing an appeal Mr. Iver-son had previously filed from the magistrate division, which added certain Trusts as third party defendants and held Mr. Iverson in contempt.

The district court found that the orders issued by the magistrate judge were not final appealable orders under Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 83(a) or Idaho Appellate Rules Rule 11(a)(4).

Mr. Iverson has neither sought nor obtained permission to appeal from any of the temporary or interlocutory orders of the magistrate or the district court judges.

The appeal of Richard M. Iverson is dismissed on the grounds and for the reason that it is an appeal from an interlocutory order and is not an appealable order pursuant to the Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure or the Idaho Appellate Rules.

Costs and attorneys fees are awarded to respondent on appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
903 P.2d 1328, 127 Idaho 631, 1995 Ida. LEXIS 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iverson-v-iverson-idaho-1995.