Ivanov v. United States

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedDecember 31, 2025
DocketCivil Action No. 2025-2435
StatusPublished

This text of Ivanov v. United States (Ivanov v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ivanov v. United States, (D.D.C. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MYKHAILO S. IVANOV, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 25-2435 (UNA) ) U.S.A., ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis

and pro se civil complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed

for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

“Article III of the United States Constitution limits the judicial power to deciding ‘Cases

and Controversies.’” In re Navy Chaplaincy, 534 F.3d 756, 759 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (quoting U.S.

Const. art. III, § 2), cert. denied, 556 U.S. 1167 (2009). “One element of the case-or-controversy

requirement is that plaintiffs must establish that they have standing to sue.” Comm. on Judiciary

of U.S. House of Representatives v. McGahn, 968 F.3d 755, 762 (D.C. Cir. 2020) (citations and

internal quotation marks omitted). A party has standing for purposes of Article III if he has “(1)

suffered an injury in fact, (2) that is fairly traceable to the challenged conduct of the defendant,

and (3) that is likely to be redressed by a favorable judicial decision.” Id. at 763 (quoting Lujan v.

Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560 (1992)).

The plaintiff allegedly is the victim of sexual assault, domestic violence, and unspecified

hate crime. Compl. (ECF No. 1) at 4 (page numbers designated by CM/ECF). Even after having

been granted asylum in the United States in 2020, see generally id., Ex. (ECF No. 1-2), the plaintiff

allegedly has “a credible fear of persecution or torture in the U.S.A.” Id. at 4. Missing from the complaint are any factual allegations demonstrating that the plaintiff has sustained, or is likely to

sustain, an injury of any kind. Nor are there factual allegations that the defendant has committed,

or likely will commit, an action causing the plaintiff injury. Without such allegations, the plaintiff

does not establish standing, and, therefore, the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over his

claims.

An Order is issued separately.

/s/ ANA C. REYES United States District Judge DATE: December 31, 2025

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife
504 U.S. 555 (Supreme Court, 1992)
Committee on the Judiciary v. Donald McGahn, II
968 F.3d 755 (D.C. Circuit, 2020)
Kay v. Johnson
129 S. Ct. 1933 (Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ivanov v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ivanov-v-united-states-dcd-2025.