Ivan Rodriguez v. State
This text of Ivan Rodriguez v. State (Ivan Rodriguez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
IVAN RODRIGUEZ,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D16-1696
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed March 17, 2017
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Julie H. O'Kane, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Nicole Joanne Martingano, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED without prejudice to file a timely, facially sufficient motion under Florida
Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
ORFINGER, EVANDER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ivan Rodriguez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ivan-rodriguez-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.