IVAN KAPITANOV v. VASILE SILVIU VRANAU
This text of IVAN KAPITANOV v. VASILE SILVIU VRANAU (IVAN KAPITANOV v. VASILE SILVIU VRANAU) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed July 21, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-1928 Lower Tribunal No. 20-21380 ________________
Ivan Kapitanov, et al., Appellants,
vs.
Vasile Silviu Vranau, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami- Dade County, Veronica Diaz, Judge.
Sunrise Law Firm, PLLC, and Anna V. Perekotiy, for appellants.
Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Therese A. Savona and Alexandra Valdes (Orlando), for appellees.
Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and GORDO and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Young v. Achenbauch, 136 So. 3d 575, 581 (Fla. 2014)
(“The standard of review for orders entered on motions to disqualify
counsel is that of an abuse of discretion. While the trial court’s discretion is
limited by the applicable legal principles, the appellate court will not
substitute its judgment for the trial court’s express or implied findings of fact
which are supported by competent substantial evidence.” (quoting Applied
Digit. Sols., Inc. v. Vasa, 941 So. 2d 404, 408 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006))).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
IVAN KAPITANOV v. VASILE SILVIU VRANAU, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ivan-kapitanov-v-vasile-silviu-vranau-fladistctapp-2021.