I.V. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

I.V. v. State

562 So. 2d 854, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4462, 1990 WL 83617

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 21, 1990

DocketNo. 89-337

StatusPublished

This text of 562 So. 2d 854 (I.V. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

I.V. v. State, 562 So. 2d 854, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4462, 1990 WL 83617 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a juvenile, appeals the denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal and his subsequent conviction of two counts of grand theft of an automobile. The evidence against appellant was sparse and entirely circumstantial. Because the state failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence, we reverse. E.g., Newberry v. State, 442 So.2d 334 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

REVERSED.

COBB, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a juvenile, appeals the denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal and his subsequent conviction of two counts of grand theft of an automobile. The evidence against appellant was sparse and entirely circumstantial. Because the state failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence, we reverse. E.g., Newberry v. State, 442 So.2d 334 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

REVERSED.

COBB, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

562 So. 2d 854, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4462, 1990 WL 83617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iv-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack