Iuppa v. Saxton
This text of 176 A.D. 944 (Iuppa v. Saxton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff’s exceptions sustained and motion for new trial granted, with costs to plaintiff to abide event. Held, that there was a question of fact to be submitted to the jury as to whether the plaintiff was negligent in failing to [945]*945discover sooner than he did that the defendant was about to violate the law of the road
See Highway Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 25; Laws of 1909, chap. 30), § 283, subd. 3, as added by Laws of 1910, chap. 374; Rochester Ordinances, art. 2, § 10, subd. 5.— [Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 A.D. 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iuppa-v-saxton-nyappdiv-1917.