IU International Corp. v. NX Acquisition Corp.

840 F.2d 229
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in IU International Corp. v. NX Acquisition Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 840 F.2d 220
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 17, 1988·No. No. 88-3013·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

By a split vote the panel affirmed the judgment of the district court denying a preliminary injunction enjoining the tender offer of NX Acquisition Corporation, et al. for alleged noncompliance with the Williams Act and the regulations thereunder. IU International Corporation v. NX Acquisition Corp., 840 F.2d 220 (4 Cir.1988). Thereafter a majority of the court voted to reconsider the case in banc.

The case has been reconsidered in banc by a consideration of the briefs and panel opinions. A majority of the in banc court has voted to affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons set forth in the majority panel opinion. Judges Winter, Russell and Sprouse dissent. They would reverse for the reasons set forth in the dissenting panel opinion.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IU International Corp. v. NX Acquisition Corp., 840 F.2d 229 (4th Cir. 1988).

840 F.2d 229 (IU International Corp. v. NX Acquisition Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.