Ittel v. Tucker

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Ittel v. Tucker

302 A.2d 872, 8 Pa. Commw. 434, 1973 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 735

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 13, 1973·No. No. 231 C.D. 1973·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam,

For the reasons set forth in our opinion filed in Allegheny County Commissioners, et al. v. C. DeLores Tucker, 7 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 649, A. 2d , filed February 20, 1973, we enter the following

Order

And Now, March 13, 1973, the Petition for Declaratory Judgment is allowed, and we hereby declare that the Act of December 29, 1971, P. L. 630, No. 167, Section 3, 17 P.S. §790.63, is constitutional, and declare further that the commissions issued by C. DeLores Tucker, Secretary of the Commonwealth, to respondents Louis Sparvero, I. Martin Wekselman, Livingstone Johnson, and Nathan Schwartz are valid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

For the reasons set forth in our opinion filed in Allegheny County Commissioners, et al. v. C. DeLores Tucker, 7 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 649, A. 2d , filed February 20, 1973, we enter the following

Order

And Now, March 13, 1973, the Petition for Declaratory Judgment is allowed, and we hereby declare that the Act of December 29, 1971, P. L. 630, No. 167, Section 3, 17 P.S. §790.63, is constitutional, and declare further that the commissions issued by C. DeLores Tucker, Secretary of the Commonwealth, to respondents Louis Sparvero, I. Martin Wekselman, Livingstone Johnson, and Nathan Schwartz are valid.

Ittel v. Tucker, 302 A.2d 872, 8 Pa. Commw. 434, 1973 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 735 (Pa. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

302 A.2d 872 (Ittel v. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related