Ittel v. Tucker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Ittel v. Tucker

302 A.2d 830, 451 Pa. 579, 1973 Pa. LEXIS 566

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 3, 1973

DocketAppeal, No. 117

StatusPublished

This text of 302 A.2d 830 (Ittel v. Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ittel v. Tucker, 302 A.2d 830, 451 Pa. 579, 1973 Pa. LEXIS 566 (Pa. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The Court being equally divided, the order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Jones, Mr. Justice Eagen and Mr. Justice Manderino would affirm the order of the Commonwealth Court. Mr. Justice Roberts, Mr. Justice Pomeroy and Mr. Justice Nix would reverse the order of the Commonwealth Court. Mr. Justice O’Brien took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The Court being equally divided, the order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Jones, Mr. Justice Eagen and Mr. Justice Manderino would affirm the order of the Commonwealth Court. Mr. Justice Roberts, Mr. Justice Pomeroy and Mr. Justice Nix would reverse the order of the Commonwealth Court. Mr. Justice O’Brien took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

302 A.2d 830, 451 Pa. 579, 1973 Pa. LEXIS 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ittel-v-tucker-pa-1973.