ITT Continental Baking Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Dept. of Labor
This text of 983 F.2d 298 (ITT Continental Baking Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Dept. of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
983 F.2d 298
299 U.S.App.D.C. 273
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
ITT Continental Baking Company and Insurance Company of
North America, Petitioners.
v.
Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United
States Department of Labor
and
Keith R. Schwartz, Respondents.
No. 91-1579.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Jan. 19, 1993.
PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Ben.Rev.Bd.
DENIED.
BEFORE: Silberman, Buckley and Henderson, Circuit Judges
JUDGMENT
This case was considered on the record on review of a final order of the Benefits Review Board, United States Department of Labor, and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 14(c). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied. The Benefits Review Board properly reversed the Administrative Law Judge's award of Section 8(f) relief. Schwartz's physical condition prior to the surgery did not establish that he suffered from a pre-existing permanent partial disability, triggering Section 8(f) relief. See Director, OWCP v. Berkstresser, 921 F.2d 306, 311 (D.C.Cir.1991).
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
983 F.2d 298, 299 U.S. App. D.C. 273, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 5075, 1993 WL 10835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/itt-continental-baking-co-v-director-office-of-workers-compensation-cadc-1993.