It's Prime Only, Inc. v. Darden

580 S.E.2d 366, 357 N.C. 164

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 1, 2003·No. No. 545P02·Published

Opinion

1. Defs’ and Pits’ (Keith and Charlene B. Darden) Motion for Variance of the Requirements of the Rules of Appellate Procedure (COAOl-1246)

2. Defs’ (Norman W. Shearin, Vandeventer, Black, Meredith & Martin, L.L.P.) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. Defs’ (Billy G. Roughton, James Soules, Russell Poland, David Irby, and It’s Prime Only, Inc.) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1. Defs’ and Pits’ (Keith and Charlene B. Darden) Motion for Variance of the Requirements of the Rules of Appellate Procedure (COAOl-1246)

2. Defs’ (Norman W. Shearin, Vandeventer, Black, Meredith & Martin, L.L.P.) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. Defs’ (Billy G. Roughton, James Soules, Russell Poland, David Irby, and It’s Prime Only, Inc.) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

It's Prime Only, Inc. v. Darden, 580 S.E.2d 366, 357 N.C. 164 (N.C. 2003).

Pincite

580 S.E.2d 366 (It's Prime Only, Inc. v. Darden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.