Itro v. Whitelaw

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Itro v. Whitelaw

531 So. 2d 252, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4191, 1988 WL 97829

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 23, 1988

DocketNo. 87-3578

StatusPublished

This text of 531 So. 2d 252 (Itro v. Whitelaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Itro v. Whitelaw, 531 So. 2d 252, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4191, 1988 WL 97829 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment in favor of ap-pellee, S.J. Whitelaw on his counterclaim and against appellants, Vincent Itro d/b/a A-Team Renovation and Jim Martucci, on their complaint. We remand, however for the recalculation of the amount of the judgment entered in appellee’s favor. The parties agree that $79.50 should be deducted from the award.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and LEHAN and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment in favor of ap-pellee, S.J. Whitelaw on his counterclaim and against appellants, Vincent Itro d/b/a A-Team Renovation and Jim Martucci, on their complaint. We remand, however for the recalculation of the amount of the judgment entered in appellee’s favor. The parties agree that $79.50 should be deducted from the award.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and LEHAN and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

531 So. 2d 252, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4191, 1988 WL 97829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/itro-v-whitelaw-fladistctapp-1988.