Itmann Coal Co. v. Miller

272 S.E.2d 668, 166 W. Va. 84, 1980 W. Va. LEXIS 621
CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 9, 1980
DocketNo. 14619
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 272 S.E.2d 668 (Itmann Coal Co. v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Itmann Coal Co. v. Miller, 272 S.E.2d 668, 166 W. Va. 84, 1980 W. Va. LEXIS 621 (W. Va. 1980).

Opinion

Harshbarger, Justice:

The Department of Mines appeals a decision by the Kanawha County Circuit Court that West Virginia Code, 22-2-1, et seq., does not require preshift examinations by fire bosses of mine beltway entries and beltways.

“Statutes which relate to the same persons or things, or to the same class of persons or things, or statutes which have a common purpose will be regarded in pari materia to assume recognition and implementation of the legislative intent. ...” Fruehauf Corp. v. Huntington Moving & Storage Co., 159 W.Va. 14, 217 S.E.2d 907 (1975), Syllabus Point 5.

Chapter 22 of the West Virginia Code regulates mining. The Department of Mines if mandated to “give prime consideration to the protection of the safety and health of persons employed within or at the mines of this State.” Code, 22-1-2.

The most instructive section is entitled “Safety inspection; removal of gases”:

It shall be the duty of the mine foreman, assistant mine foreman or fire boss to examine all working places under his supervision for hazards at least once every two hours during each coal-producing shift, or more often if necessary for safety. In all mines such examinations shall include tests with an approved detector for methane and oxygen deficiency and may also include tests with a permissible flame safety lamp. It shall also be his duty to remove as soon as possible after its discovery any accumulations of explosive or noxious gases in active workings, and where practicable, any accumulations of explosive or noxious gases in the worked out and abandoned portions of the mine. It shall be the duty of the mine foreman, assistant mine foreman or fire boss to examine each mine within three hours prior to the [86]*86beginning of a shift and before any miner in such shift enters the active workings of the mine. Code, 22-2-14. (Emphasis added).

So it is the duty of the underground mine foreman - fire boss or his assistant

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United Mine Workers of America v. Faerber
365 S.E.2d 345 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1986)
State Ex Rel. Perry v. Miller
300 S.E.2d 622 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1983)
Perry v. Miller
272 S.E.2d 678 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 S.E.2d 668, 166 W. Va. 84, 1980 W. Va. LEXIS 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/itmann-coal-co-v-miller-wva-1980.