Itkin v. Abramson-Engesser Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Itkin v. Abramson-Engesser Co.

130 N.Y.S. 234

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 29, 1911

StatusPublished

This text of 130 N.Y.S. 234 (Itkin v. Abramson-Engesser Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Itkin v. Abramson-Engesser Co., 130 N.Y.S. 234 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

GUY, J.

Plaintiff sues to recover $475 for work, labor, and services in doing cabinet work by plaintiff’s assignor; also for $20 for extra work. The answer sets up a counterclaim against plaintiff’s assignor for $116.35 for moneys expended in completing work which he failed to perform under his contract.

The plaintiff’s assignor testified that he did not furnish the marble, or the hardware, or set up the mirrors in the store, as provided for in his contract. The defense proved without contradiction that these items cost $118.35, but the answer limits the amount to $116.35. On the evidence defendant is entitled to offset plaintiff’s claim of $495 by this amount, thus reducing the plaintiff’s claim to $378.65, which, with the costs, $82.62, would make the proper amount of the judgment $461.27.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event, unless plaintiff stipulates within 10 days to reduce the amount of the judgment to $461.27, in which event the judgment, as so modified, is affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GUY, J.

Plaintiff sues to recover $475 for work, labor, and services in doing cabinet work by plaintiff’s assignor; also for $20 for extra work. The answer sets up a counterclaim against plaintiff’s assignor for $116.35 for moneys expended in completing work which he failed to perform under his contract.

The plaintiff’s assignor testified that he did not furnish the marble, or the hardware, or set up the mirrors in the store, as provided for in his contract. The defense proved without contradiction that these items cost $118.35, but the answer limits the amount to $116.35. On the evidence defendant is entitled to offset plaintiff’s claim of $495 by this amount, thus reducing the plaintiff’s claim to $378.65, which, with the costs, $82.62, would make the proper amount of the judgment $461.27.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event, unless plaintiff stipulates within 10 days to reduce the amount of the judgment to $461.27, in which event the judgment, as so modified, is affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 N.Y.S. 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/itkin-v-abramson-engesser-co-nyappterm-1911.