ITIS Inc. F/K/A Internet Law Library and Governet Affairs, Inc. v. Donald Kellam and Hunter Capital Group, L.L.C

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 5, 2003
Docket14-03-00598-CV
StatusPublished

This text of ITIS Inc. F/K/A Internet Law Library and Governet Affairs, Inc. v. Donald Kellam and Hunter Capital Group, L.L.C (ITIS Inc. F/K/A Internet Law Library and Governet Affairs, Inc. v. Donald Kellam and Hunter Capital Group, L.L.C) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ITIS Inc. F/K/A Internet Law Library and Governet Affairs, Inc. v. Donald Kellam and Hunter Capital Group, L.L.C, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 5, 2003

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 5, 2003.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-03-00598-CV

ITIS INC. f/k/a INTERNET LAW LIBRARY and GOVERNET AFFAIRS, INC., Appellants

V.

DONALD KELLAM and HUNTER CAPITAL GROUP, L.L.C., Appellees

____________________________________________

On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 02-16055

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

            This is an appeal from a final judgment signed February 12, 2003.  Appellants timely filed a motion for new trial, which was overruled by operation of law.  Appellants then filed their notice of appeal and a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal.  On May 27, 2003, the day before its plenary power expired, the trial court signed an order granting a new trial and vacating the judgment that is the subject of this appeal.  See Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(e); In re Luster, 77 S.W.3d 331, 335 n.1. (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, orig. proceeding) (noting trial court’s power to grant a motion for new trial within 30 days after it has been overruled, but not to “ungrant” such a motion more than 75 days after it was filed). 

            On May 28, 2003, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because it has been rendered moot.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.  The motion is granted.  Appellants’ motion for extension of time to file their notice of appeal is also denied as moot.

            Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

                                                                                    PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed June 5, 2003.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Brister and Justices Fowler and Edelman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Luster
77 S.W.3d 331 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
ITIS Inc. F/K/A Internet Law Library and Governet Affairs, Inc. v. Donald Kellam and Hunter Capital Group, L.L.C, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/itis-inc-fka-internet-law-library-and-governet-aff-texapp-2003.