Itasca Cedar & Tie Co. v. McKinley
This text of 152 N.W. 653 (Itasca Cedar & Tie Co. v. McKinley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon a former appeal in this ease a new trial was granted. Itasca Cedar & Tie Co. v. McKinley, 124 Minn. 183, 144 N. W. 768. After the case had been remanded, plaintiff made an application to file an amended and supplemental complaint. This application was denied by the trial court, and plaintiff appealed from the order denying it. It is well settled that such an order, made before judgment, is not appealable. Hanley v. Board of Co. Commrs. of Cass County, 87 Minn. 209, 91 N. W. 756; Stromme v. Rieck, 110 Minn. 472, 125 N. W. 1021.
It follows that the appeal must be dismissed. So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
152 N.W. 653, 129 Minn. 536, 1915 Minn. LEXIS 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/itasca-cedar-tie-co-v-mckinley-minn-1915.