Iszard Ballard, Jr. v. D. A. Smith, Officer R. Brumback, Officer M. Ebersole, Officer.

17 F.3d 1433, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12194, 1994 WL 66016
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 2, 1994
Docket93-6633
StatusPublished

This text of 17 F.3d 1433 (Iszard Ballard, Jr. v. D. A. Smith, Officer R. Brumback, Officer M. Ebersole, Officer.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Iszard Ballard, Jr. v. D. A. Smith, Officer R. Brumback, Officer M. Ebersole, Officer., 17 F.3d 1433, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12194, 1994 WL 66016 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

17 F.3d 1433
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Iszard BALLARD, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
D. A. SMITH, Officer; R. Brumback, Officer; M. Ebersole,
Officer. Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-6633.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 7, 1994.
Decided: March 2, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-90-1782-JFM)

Iszard Ballard, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ballard v. Smith, No. CA-90-1782-JFM (D. Md. May 3, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 F.3d 1433, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12194, 1994 WL 66016, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iszard-ballard-jr-v-d-a-smith-officer-r-brumback-o-ca4-1994.