Isso, Esq. v. Gaar
This text of Isso, Esq. v. Gaar (Isso, Esq. v. Gaar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JENNIFER ISSO, ESQ., No. 84621 Appellant, vs. FILED HENRY E. GAAR, AUG O 4 2022 Respondent. EtNN ELI FM :iiUFRENC: COURT
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL D t.A.ERK
This is an appeal from a district court order affirming and adopting the findings of the discovery commissioner regarding issues arising during the discovery process. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; T. Arthur Ritchie, Jr., Judge. Initial review of the docketing statement and documents before this court revealed potential jurisdictional defects. Specifically, it appeared that appellant lacked standing to bring this appeal and that the challenged order is not substantively appealable. Accordingly, this court directed
appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant has filed her response to this court's show cause order in which she expresses her intention to voluntarily dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, appellant's request for a voluntary dismissal of this appeal is granted, and this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED,
Hardesty
A"14CtA--iQ , J. Stiglich Herndon SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
19-17A cc: Hon. T. Arthur Ritchie, Jr., District Judge, Family Court Division Israel Kunin, Settlement Judge Isso & Hughes Law Firm Jacobson Law Office, Ltd. Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
40) 1947A 694;r:IP
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Isso, Esq. v. Gaar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isso-esq-v-gaar-nev-2022.