Issac v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Issac v. State

226 So. 2d 363

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 17, 1969·No. No. 2310·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The record in this case permits an informed judgment by this court that the in-court identification by the victim had a source wholly independent of the police station lineup confrontation. This is the only point raised on appeal and the judgment is therefore affirmed on the authority of United States v. Wade, 1967, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149; Stovall v. Denno, 1967, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199, and Anderson v. State, Fla.App.1968, 215 So.2d 618.

CROSS, C. J., and McCAIN and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The record in this case permits an informed judgment by this court that the in-court identification by the victim had a source wholly independent of the police station lineup confrontation. This is the only point raised on appeal and the judgment is therefore affirmed on the authority of United States v. Wade, 1967, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149; Stovall v. Denno, 1967, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199, and Anderson v. State, Fla.App.1968, 215 So.2d 618.

CROSS, C. J., and McCAIN and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Issac v. State, 226 So. 2d 363 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

226 So. 2d 363 (Issac v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related