Issac Montes v. Overhead Door Corporation, Randall Furbay, Individually and as Overhead Management and Jane Doe, Individually and as Overhead Management

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 29, 2019
Docket13-19-00018-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Issac Montes v. Overhead Door Corporation, Randall Furbay, Individually and as Overhead Management and Jane Doe, Individually and as Overhead Management (Issac Montes v. Overhead Door Corporation, Randall Furbay, Individually and as Overhead Management and Jane Doe, Individually and as Overhead Management) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Issac Montes v. Overhead Door Corporation, Randall Furbay, Individually and as Overhead Management and Jane Doe, Individually and as Overhead Management, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-19-00018-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

ISAAC MONTES, Appellant,

v.

OVERHEAD DOOR CORPORATION, RANDALL FURBAY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS OVERHEAD MANAGEMENT, AND JANE DOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS OVERHEAD MANAGEMENT, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________

On Appellant’s Motion to Stay Appeal ____________________________________________________________

ORDER Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria Order Per Curiam

Appellant Isaac Montes filed a petition for writ of mandamus, which this court

denied without reaching the merits. Appellant’s writ for mandamus is now pending

pending before the Texas Supreme Court. If the mandamus is granted, then the current appeal will become moot. Accordingly, appellant has filed an opposed “Motion

to Stay Appeal Pending Petition for Writ of Mandamus Before the Texas Supreme Court”

to stay the appeal for at least thirty days, after which time appellant has agreed to move

forward with the current appeal regardless of whether the Supreme Court has ruled on

the mandamus.

Having reviewed appellant’s motion, we hereby GRANT the motion. We order

all proceedings and deadlines on appeal STAYED for thirty days.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 29th day of January, 2019.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Issac Montes v. Overhead Door Corporation, Randall Furbay, Individually and as Overhead Management and Jane Doe, Individually and as Overhead Management, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/issac-montes-v-overhead-door-corporation-randall-furbay-individually-and-texapp-2019.