Issa v. Boeing Commercial Aircrafts Company

Opinion

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT June 21, 2024 WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS =—_CLERK. US. DISTRICT COURT SAN ANTONIO DIVISION BY: NM JOSEPH HALIROU ISSA ) peputy ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) CIVIL NO. SA-23-CV-1029-OLG ) ) BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFTS ) COMPANY, VOLT INFORMATION ) SCIENCE, INC. ) ) Defendant ) ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION On this date the Court considered the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth 8. Chestney, filed in the above-styled and numbered cause on May 20, 2024. Docket no. 23. The parties were served with a copy of the recommendation, but no objections were filed.' When no party has objected to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation, the Court need not conduct a de novo review. Instead, the Court need only review the recommendation and determine whether it is either clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918 (1989). The Court has reviewed the recommendation and the findings and conclusions therein are neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. It is therefore ORDERED that the recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney, filed in this cause on May 20, 2024, is hereby ACCEPTED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

'A party desiring to object to a magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations must file and serve written objections within 14 days after being served with the recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R.CIv. P. 72(b)(2). Service is made to the last known address of the party or his attorney, and service by mail is complete upon mailing. FED. R. Civ. P. 5(b).

It is further ORDERED that all claims asserted in this lawsuit are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for the reasons stated in the recommendation. Final judgment may be entered accordingly, and this case may be closed. SIGNED and ENTERED on the u day of June, 2024.

ORLANDO L. ke UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE