Israelstam v. United States Casualty Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Israelstam v. United States Casualty Co.

201 Ill. App. 512, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 758

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 18, 1916

DocketGen. No. 20,862

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 201 Ill. App. 512 (Israelstam v. United States Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Israelstam v. United States Casualty Co., 201 Ill. App. 512, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 758 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Insurance, § 287*—what is purpose of condition in policy for keeping of accounts. On an appeal by an insurer from a judgment for a loss entered in favor of the insured under a policy of burglary insurance, providing that there could be no recovery for loss if the accounts and records of the insured were not so kept that the actual loss could be accurately determined therefrom, held that the judgment would not be reversed on the ground that the condition in respect to the keeping of accounts had not been fulfilled by the insured where it was not claimed that the judgment did not represent the amount of the loss, as such condition was merely intended to protect the insurer against an excessive claim.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Insurance, § 287*—what is purpose of condition in policy for keeping of accounts. On an appeal by an insurer from a judgment for a loss entered in favor of the insured under a policy of burglary insurance, providing that there could be no recovery for loss if the accounts and records of the insured were not so kept that the actual loss could be accurately determined therefrom, held that the judgment would not be reversed on the ground that the condition in respect to the keeping of accounts had not been fulfilled by the insured where it was not claimed that the judgment did not represent the amount of the loss, as such condition was merely intended to protect the insurer against an excessive claim.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 Ill. App. 512, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/israelstam-v-united-states-casualty-co-illappct-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack