Israel v. Israel

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Israel v. Israel

134 F. 1023, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 5092

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 6, 1905

DocketNo. 24

StatusPublished

This text of 134 F. 1023 (Israel v. Israel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Israel v. Israel, 134 F. 1023, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 5092 (circtedpa 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

HOLLAND, District Judge.

The motion for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense cannot be sustained. The defense set up in the affidavit raises issues of fact which should be submitted to a jury, and, if proven to the satisfaction of the jury, the defendant may be entitled to a verdict, and the questions of law which must be considered by the court can be passed upon more intelligently after a full discovery of all the facts. Motion for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOLLAND, District Judge.

The motion for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense cannot be sustained. The defense set up in the affidavit raises issues of fact which should be submitted to a jury, and, if proven to the satisfaction of the jury, the defendant may be entitled to a verdict, and the questions of law which must be considered by the court can be passed upon more intelligently after a full discovery of all the facts. Motion for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense is overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 F. 1023, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 5092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/israel-v-israel-circtedpa-1905.