Israel v. Drei Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Israel v. Drei Corp.

5 A.D.2d 987, 173 N.Y.S.2d 360, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6117

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 29, 1958

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 5 A.D.2d 987 (Israel v. Drei Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Israel v. Drei Corp., 5 A.D.2d 987, 173 N.Y.S.2d 360, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6117 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

— Plaintiffs-respondents assert that Louis and Gerald Lasky perform the duties of president and treasurer of the appellant unions and, therefore, service upon them satisfies the requirement of section 13 of the General Associations Law. Resolution of the legal effect of the service of process here challenged rests upon disputed factual issues which will be 'best developed on the trial of this action. The order dated August 9,1957, denying appellants’ motion to set aside service of process, is accordingly modified on the law and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of allowing the appellants to allege the facts pertaining to service of process in their answer by way of defense pursuant to paragraph (c) of subdivision 3 of section 237-a of the Civil Practice Act; the orders appealed from otherwise are affirmed, with costs to abide the event. Settle order.

Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Frank, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Plaintiffs-respondents assert that Louis and Gerald Lasky perform the duties of president and treasurer of the appellant unions and, therefore, service upon them satisfies the requirement of section 13 of the General Associations Law. Resolution of the legal effect of the service of process here challenged rests upon disputed factual issues which will be 'best developed on the trial of this action. The order dated August 9,1957, denying appellants’ motion to set aside service of process, is accordingly modified on the law and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of allowing the appellants to allege the facts pertaining to service of process in their answer by way of defense pursuant to paragraph (c) of subdivision 3 of section 237-a of the Civil Practice Act; the orders appealed from otherwise are affirmed, with costs to abide the event. Settle order.

Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Frank, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.2d 987, 173 N.Y.S.2d 360, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/israel-v-drei-corp-nyappdiv-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack