Israel Discount Bank v. 500 Fifth Avenue Associates

167 A.D.2d 203, 561 N.Y.S.2d 584, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13499
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 1990·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered December 22, 1989, which granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213, and denied the cross motion by defendants Williams and Brown for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff established its entitlement to summary judgment in lieu of complaint on defendants’ written personal guarantees of a promissory note made by the defendant corporation by establishing execution, delivery, demand and failure to pay. (European Am. Bank & Trust Co. v Schirripa, 108 AD2d 684.) The defendants fail to substantiate, in evidentiary form, their conclusory contention that the promissory note upon which the underlying action was predicated was repaid, extended or satisfied by the issuance of a second promissory note in the same amount as the original note, with a different maturity date. In any event, the defendants would remain liable since their guarantees contemplated extensions, renewals and replacements of the underlying indebtedness. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Asch and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Israel Discount Bank v. 500 Fifth Avenue Associates, 167 A.D.2d 203, 561 N.Y.S.2d 584, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13499 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

167 A.D.2d 203 (Israel Discount Bank v. 500 Fifth Avenue Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Solomon v. Langer
66 A.D.2d 508 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Orix Credit Alliance, Inc. v. N. Y. Bell Bagel, Inc.
222 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)