Israel & Co. v. Bradick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Israel & Co. v. Bradick

285 A.D. 868, 137 N.Y.S.2d 833, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5888

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 1, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 285 A.D. 868 (Israel & Co. v. Bradick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Israel & Co. v. Bradick, 285 A.D. 868, 137 N.Y.S.2d 833, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5888 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

We are not advised by the record or briefs on this appeal as to the subdivision of the Civil Practice Act under which the warrants of attachment were secured, or what basis in law as distinguished from fact there was for the issuance of the attachments. However, on the motion addressed to the sufficiency of the complaint as it stands, it should be sustained and the action consolidated with the pending actions in which the attachments were obtained. All concur, except Cohn, J., who dissents in part and votes to affirm. Settle order. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Breitel and Bastow, JJ. [See post, p. 929.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

We are not advised by the record or briefs on this appeal as to the subdivision of the Civil Practice Act under which the warrants of attachment were secured, or what basis in law as distinguished from fact there was for the issuance of the attachments. However, on the motion addressed to the sufficiency of the complaint as it stands, it should be sustained and the action consolidated with the pending actions in which the attachments were obtained. All concur, except Cohn, J., who dissents in part and votes to affirm. Settle order. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Breitel and Bastow, JJ. [See post, p. 929.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 A.D. 868, 137 N.Y.S.2d 833, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/israel-co-v-bradick-nyappdiv-1955.