Israel Brice Deere v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 19, 2019·No. 06-19-00098-CR·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

Nos. 06-19-00097-CR &

06-19-00098-CR

ISRAEL BRICE DEERE, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 6th District Court Lamar County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 27881 & 28092

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.

ORDER

Our review of the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record in these cases indicates that they

contain “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth date, a home address, and the name of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(3). The clerk’s record and the reporter’s record contain the names of persons who were minors at the time the offense was committed. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record contain sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s record and the reporter’s record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: November 19, 2019

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Israel Brice Deere v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Israel Brice Deere v. State (Israel Brice Deere v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.