Ispahani v. Ispahani

277 A.D.2d 1057, 715 N.Y.S.2d 353, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11414

This text of 277 A.D.2d 1057 (Ispahani v. Ispahani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ispahani v. Ispahani, 277 A.D.2d 1057, 715 N.Y.S.2d 353, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11414 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memo[1058]*1058randum: We agree with plaintiff that Supreme Court erred in modifying a prior custody order and awarding custody of the parties’ son to defendant without conducting an evidentiary hearing (see, Matter of Naughton-General v Naughton, 242 AD2d 937, 938). Consequently, we reverse the order and remit the matter to Supreme Court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on defendant’s motion. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Townes, J. — Custody.) Present— Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hurlbutt, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Naughton-General v. Naughton
242 A.D.2d 937 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 A.D.2d 1057, 715 N.Y.S.2d 353, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ispahani-v-ispahani-nyappdiv-2000.