Ison v. Kennedy

54 A.D.2d 1079, 388 N.Y.S.2d 752, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15051
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 5, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 54 A.D.2d 1079 (Ison v. Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ison v. Kennedy, 54 A.D.2d 1079, 388 N.Y.S.2d 752, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15051 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Petitioners, inmates of Auburn Correctional Facility, appeal from the denial of their petition in an article 78 proceeding seeking to nullify that portion of a directive of the deputy superintendent of the facility which stated that no envelopes will be allowed to be furnished to inmates in packages or by visitors. We find no deprivation of petitioner’s rights arising by reason of the contested directive. A legitimate interest in fostering order and security in a penal institution justifies the imposition of certain restraints on inmate correspondence (Procunier v Martinez, 416 US 396, 413; Matter of Boehme v Smith, 51 AD2d 670). The directive is clearly within the powers of the deputy superintendent and is not inconsistent with the directive of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which provides that "an inmate may use stationery provided by the facility or personal stationery”. The directive now under consideration provides a reasonable safeguard against the shipping of contraband into the correctional facility. It contains no wholesale limitation upon the inmates’ rights to correspond, since envelopes are available for inmates’ use at the commissary, but simply serves, in the interests of security, to restrict the source of envelopes. As [1080]*1080such, we do not find this to be arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable. (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga Supreme Court — article 78.) Present: — Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Mahoney, Dillon and Goldman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cooper v. Morin
91 Misc. 2d 302 (New York Supreme Court, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 A.D.2d 1079, 388 N.Y.S.2d 752, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ison-v-kennedy-nyappdiv-1976.