Isol Auto Supply v. Diaz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Isol Auto Supply v. Diaz

969 So. 2d 1054, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14226, 2007 WL 2608527

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 12, 2007

DocketNo. 1D07-1308

StatusPublished

This text of 969 So. 2d 1054 (Isol Auto Supply v. Diaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Isol Auto Supply v. Diaz, 969 So. 2d 1054, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14226, 2007 WL 2608527 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the parties entered into a stipulated settlement agreement which acknowledged “that all issues are resolved except as to the amount of attorney fees and costs,” this appeal seeking review of an earlier nonfinal ruling which denied a fraud defense is dismissed. The settlement of a case renders it moot. See e.g., Santa Rosa County v. Admin. Comm’n, Div. of Admin. Hearings, 661 So.2d 1190, 1193 (Fla.1995); Jones v. Champion, 675 So.2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Seslow v. Seslow, 625 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). “Florida’s appellate courts reserve the exercise of judicial power for cases involving actual controversies.” Merkle v. Guardianship of Jacoby, 912 So.2d 595, 599 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

DISMISSED.

DAVIS, POLSTON, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because the parties entered into a stipulated settlement agreement which acknowledged “that all issues are resolved except as to the amount of attorney fees and costs,” this appeal seeking review of an earlier nonfinal ruling which denied a fraud defense is dismissed. The settlement of a case renders it moot. See e.g., Santa Rosa County v. Admin. Comm’n, Div. of Admin. Hearings, 661 So.2d 1190, 1193 (Fla.1995); Jones v. Champion, 675 So.2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Seslow v. Seslow, 625 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). “Florida’s appellate courts reserve the exercise of judicial power for cases involving actual controversies.” Merkle v. Guardianship of Jacoby, 912 So.2d 595, 599 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

DISMISSED.

DAVIS, POLSTON, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

969 So. 2d 1054, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14226, 2007 WL 2608527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isol-auto-supply-v-diaz-fladistctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack